What the Kongo cosmogram says about the line we call death

Among the BaKongo people of Central Africa — whose ancestral lands lie across what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Republic of the Congo, and northern Angola — there is a single figure that compresses a complete cosmology into the space of a hand. It is called the dikenga, or the yowa, or simply the Kongo cosmogram. In its plainest form it is a cross inside a circle, with the cardinal points named. In its fullest form it is a diagram of everything.

The horizontal line of the cross is called the kalunga. It is not, in the original understanding, a line. It is water — the threshold between the world of the living (Ku Nseke) and the world of the dead (Ku Mpemba). Crossing it is not metaphorical. It is what happens at birth, and it is what happens at death — and what we call those two events are, in the cosmogram, the same event seen from opposite sides.

The four points of the cross are not directions. They are moments — the four positions of the sun across a day, which the Kongo tradition reads as also the four positions of a person across a life. Musoni is midnight: the time of conception, the time before visible existence. Kala is sunrise: birth into the visible world. Tukula is noon: maturity, the peak of vitality. Luvemba is sunset: the passage out of the visible world, what English calls death.

What we name death the cosmogram names luvemba — and luvemba is not an endpoint. It is one of four equally-weighted moments in a cycle that does not stop. The sun does not stop at sunset. The cycle is the universe; the moments are stages within it; what passes through luvemba returns through musoni and rises again at kala. The cosmogram, read counter-clockwise, is the diagram of this.

The claim, set out in plain English, is this: there is no terminus. There is only transition through one moment of a cycle that contains four. Death is what one cycle's luvemba looks like from the side of the living. From the other side of the kalunga, it is the entry into another mode of being — one in which the deceased continues to participate in the lives of those still on this side, until eventually a new cycle begins.

This is a different metaphysics than the one most modern readers were trained on.

The dominant Western model of a human life — call it the linear model — treats life as a trajectory: a beginning at birth, a middle through accumulation and decline, and an end at death, after which there may or may not be something, but in any case nothing that continues in any continuous way the life that was. The Kongo model is not a softer version of this. It is a different geometry. The shape of a life is not a line but a circle, and what we call death is one quadrant of that circle, no less weighted than the others.

This has consequences for how the living relate to the dead. In the linear model, the dead are gone — preserved in memory, perhaps honoured, but no longer participants. In the Kongo model, the dead are bakulu — the ancestors — and they remain present, continuous, capable of guidance and reproach and protection, until they themselves complete the cycle back to musoni and emerge again. The kalunga line is permeable. Communication across it is the substance of much of what Kongo religious practice was, and is.

The cosmogram travelled. Brought across the Atlantic in the holds of slave ships, it survived in the material culture of the African diaspora — inscribed on artifacts found at sites of African enslavement in the American South, sustained in the religious traditions that became Palo Mayombe in Cuba, Vodou Petro in Haiti, and Candomblé de Angola in Brazil. The anthropologist Robert Farris Thompson, in his 1983 book Flash of the Spirit, was among the first Western scholars to trace this survival systematically.

What a modern reader is asked to do with this is not to adopt the cosmogram as a personal belief. To take a tradition seriously includes the discipline of not pretending one tradition is another. The reader is asked instead to register that the linear model of a human life is a model — held by some peoples, in some historical periods — and that there are other models, equally sophisticated, equally lived, that proceed from a different premise about what death is.

That premise is the cosmogram's claim. You do not have to believe it. You do have to acknowledge that the people who held it were not less rigorous than the people who held the linear model. They were thinking, with care, about a different shape.

Kongo philosopher, ethnographer, healer, and pre-eminent twentieth-century interpreter of Bantu-Kongo cosmology. Born on 4 April 1934 in Manianga, in what was then the Belgian Congo and is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo, into the Kongo cultural region that straddles modern DRC, the Republic of the Congo, and Angola.

Fu-Kiau was educated in both the Belgian colonial system and in three Kongo traditional educational institutions — Lemba, Kinkimba, and Kimpasi — which functioned in the Bantu world as schools of governance, healing, and moral formation. After teaching in Kinshasa, he left a comfortable academic position and returned to Manianga, where he founded the Luyalungunu Lwa Kumba-Nsi Institute and devoted himself to documenting Kongo thought from within. He later completed a doctorate at the Union Institute in Cincinnati. He died in Boston on 29 November 2013.

His 1969 work, written in Kikongo and French — N'Kongo Ye Nza Yakun'zungidila / Le Mukongo et le monde qui l'entourait — was among the first sustained articulations of Kongo cosmology by a Kongo author writing within his own intellectual tradition rather than by Western anthropologists from outside it. His 1980 book — later published in English as African Cosmology of the Bântu-Kôngo: Tying the Spiritual Knot — remains the standard interlocutor for any serious engagement with the Kongo intellectual tradition.

His central methodological insistence: African cosmologies cannot be properly translated using Western categories, because the categories themselves carry assumptions the cosmologies do not share.

If the cycle is real, you are someone's ancestor in the making. What kind of one?

— Wisdom of Africa

Next issue arrives in a week.