The word has travelled badly. In the boardroom, Ubuntu is a teamwork slogan. In wellness culture, it is shorthand for African warmth. In the 1990s, it became the name of a Linux distribution. None of these uses is wrong, exactly. None of them is enough.
Ubuntu — properly understood — is a philosophical claim about what a human being is. The claim is sharper than its English paraphrases suggest. The familiar translation, I am because we are, reads as a sentimental motto. The original is not sentimental. It is a metaphysics.
In the Nguni languages of southern Africa — Zulu, Xhosa, Ndebele, Swati — umuntu is the word for a person. Abantu is the plural. The phrase umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu asserts that personhood is not an inherent quality of the individual organism. It is something achieved, conferred, and sustained through relation with others. A human born into total isolation, in this view, has not yet become a person in the full sense. They have the potential. They lack the conditions.
This has consequences.
It means, first, that ethics is not optional decoration on personhood — it is the activity by which one becomes more fully a person. Cruelty is not just morally wrong; it is ontologically reductive. The cruel person is, in a real sense, less of a person than the kind one.
It means, second, that punishment cannot be the final answer to wrongdoing. If a wrongdoer is not yet fully a person, the right response is restoration, not annihilation. South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, in the 1990s, was an attempt — partial, contested, but real — to build a national process on this foundation. It did not work perfectly. It also could not have worked from any other premise.
It means, third, that the Western philosophical tradition beginning with Descartes — I think, therefore I am — describes only one possible structure of human existence. The Ubuntu tradition describes another. Both can be defended. Only one of them has, until recently, been taught.
The work of articulating Ubuntu philosophically — in the same registers, and with the same rigour, that Western traditions have long enjoyed — has fallen to scholars like Mogobe Ramose, Augustine Shutte, and the Kenyan theologian John Mbiti. The work is not finished. But it has begun.
What this means for a modern reader: when you next encounter Ubuntu on a corporate slide or a holiday card, sit with it for a second. The original claim is not "we're all in this together." The original claim is that you are constituted, in part, by the people around you — and you are constituting them in return. Every encounter is small ontological work.
Few ideas are as old. Few are as quietly demanding.
Figure: John Mbiti (1931–2019)
Kenyan-born philosopher, theologian, and Anglican priest. Born in Kitui in 1931, Mbiti completed his doctorate at Cambridge in 1963, taught at Makerere University in Uganda from 1964 to 1974, and spent the rest of his working life in Switzerland — as director of the World Council of Churches' Bossey Institute, Emeritus professor at the University of Bern, and parish minister in Burgdorf, where he died in 2019.
His 1969 work African Religions and Philosophy was among the first to present African religious thought as a coherent intellectual system, against Western dismissals of it as primitive. His formulation of African communal personhood — I am because we are; and since we are, therefore I am — became the most-quoted line in popular discussions of Ubuntu, often without attribution to him.
A question to sit with
If personhood is something achieved through relation, what kind of person are you currently helping to constitute?
— Wisdom of Africa
Next issue arrives in a week.